By presenting each Era, we can now move to start talking about the theory of the first and the third person in video games.
1-First Person Shooter, Multi-Tiered Environment: In FPS-MTE video games, the player sees the environment of the game throughout his character’s eyes. Evil Master and enemies are just around every single corner in the game and waiting to kill or to be killed.
2-First Person Shooter, Rait: In FPS-R video games, the character in controlled by the player, so the player should be able to kill the evil before he kills the character.
3-Third Person Shooting and Fighting: TPSF video games show the gamer his entire avatar in a way that he will be able to characterize it. In these games, the gamer can choose the race; sex, gender, and the overall look of his/her avatar. Locked avatars can be unlocked just by getting a certain level of killing proficiency.
The word shooting was mentioned three, and maybe more, times in this small general explanation, and this mentioning brings to our mind the sad event that happened once in Columbine High School when shooters Dylan Harris and Eric Klebold attacked their own classmates and teachers, and after that, they killed themselves. After this event, researchers have linked the shooters’ behavior with the fact that they were addicted to violent video games. And because of this result, the U.S Department of Education started its own investigation, between 1974 and 2000, to look for commonalities between the attackers in schools and to create a certain view about them to prevent school shooting for happing again. But after the Department’s long and serious detection, the results were not useful for their purpose because it was obvious that males who had suicidal thoughts were depressed and were having negative feelings about themselves, so it all does not have any relation between violent in real life and violent in video games. It seems that both The U.S Secret Services and The Federal Bureau of Investigation National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crimes do agree with the U.S Department about the fact that there is no relation between violence in real life and violence video games. After this amazing result, lots of researchers started to put their effort to describe the limitation of some studies about how media violence affect youth:
1-The confusing usage of “Aggression” and “violent”. Because some researchers seem to use these terms as one leading to the other.
2-The environmental causes play a very important role in how ones will handle his ever-day life.
3-Generalization in the results. Psychologists seem to be unpleased about this way because they claimed that each adult has his own personality and his way of getting the message from violent video games, and of course each adult has his own environment and each group has its own culture and so on.
4-The artificial environment subjects involve in turn the game play into game work, which means subjects have a limited time to learn the game, they don’t choose what to play or how, and the results will involve the way they played.
5-Researchers tend to draw a causality relation between violent video games and aggression in real life, but in real life, it seems more complicated:
“It is a two way relationship, in which violent kids seek violent games, and violent games cause violent actions and thoughts.”

Really it's an important topic

Lot of thanks for you Angelic Vampire

God bless your effort dear

Have a nice time

Leen
Thanks alot for passin by
I'll always try my best
Thanks alot again
be safe